Details

Historicizing the Embodied Imagination in Early Modern English Literature

von: Mark Kaethler, Grant Williams
160,49 €
Verlag:	Palgrave Macmillan
Format:	PDF
Veröffentl.:	07.07.2024
ISBN/EAN:	9783031550645
Sprache:	englisch
Anzahl Seiten:	368

In den Warenkorb

Als Gutschein

Dieses eBook enthält ein Wasserzeichen.

Beschreibungen

1 Introduction: The Imagination and Image in Premodern Faculty Psychology.- Part I The Visual Imagination.- 2 The Imagination in Distress: Amoret’s Brain and the Busyrane Factor in Spenser’s Faerie Queene, Book 3.- 3 “If all the world could have seen’t”: Imagination and the Unseen in The Winter’s Tale.- 4 The Iconoclastic Imagination: John Donne’s Metaphysical Conceits.- Part II Sensory and Affective Imaginings.- 5 The Phenomenal Imagining Body in Shakespeare.- 6 Infected Fancies and Penetrative Poetics in The Rape of Lucrece.- 7 The “Imagination of Eating”: The Role of the Imagination in Appetite Stimulation and Suppression.-  Part III Artifice and the Mnemonic Imagination.- 8 Confronting Imagination in Langland, Spenser, and Bacon.- 9 The Feudal Art of Memory and the Treacherous Imagination: Coveting the Golden Phantasm in Mammon’s House of Trade.- 10 Seeing God Through Spectacles: Donne’s “Engines” of the Imagination.- 11 “A Work of Fancy”: World-Making Imagination as an Art of Memory in Margaret Cavendish’s Blazing World.- Part IV Higher Imaginings.- 12 Fantasy and the Imagined Music of the Spheres in Pericles.- 13 Reconciliation and Recreation at the Meeting Place for Opposites: Revisiting Donne’s Imagined Corners.- 14 “I think h’as knocked his brains out”: Unhealthy Imagination in The Atheist’s Tragedy.- 15 From the Image of Christ to the Imagining of the Sovereign: Donne, Hobbes, and the Eclipse of Participation and Transformation.

Autorenportrait

Mark Kaethler is Academic Chair of Arts at Medicine Hat College in Medicine Hat, Canada. They work on research teams with the Map of Early Modern London and Linked Early Modern Drama Online at the University of Victoria, both of which have been funded by SSHRC grants. They are Book Reviews Editor for Early Theatre, and they are the author of Thomas Middleton and the Plural Politics of Jacobean Drama as well as a co-editor of Shakespeare’s Language in Digital Media: Old Words, New Tools. Their work has appeared in Shakespeare, The London Journal, Early Theatre, Literature Compass, and several other journals and edited collections.

Grant Williams is an Associate Professor in the Department of English at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. With William E. Engel, he has co-edited the essay collection The Shakespearean Death Arts (Palgrave, 2022), and, with Engel and Rory Loughnane, co-edited the collection Memory and Mortality in Renaissance England (Cambridge, 2022). With Donald Beecher, he is co-editor of Henry Chettle’s Kind-Heart’s Dream and Piers Plainness: Two Pamphlets from the Elizabethan Book Trade (CRRS, 2022). He has co-authored two critical anthologies with Engel and Loughnane: The Death Arts in Renaissance England (Cambridge, 2022) and The Memory Arts in Renaissance England (Cambridge, 2016).

Back cover copy

Commonly used as a rallying cry for general approaches to literary studies, the imagination has until recently been overwritten with romantic and modernist inflections that impede our understanding of literature’s intimate involvement in early modern cognition. To recover the pre-Cartesian imagination, this collection of essays takes a historicist approach by situating literary texts within the embodied and ensouled faculty system. Image-making and fantasizing were not autonomous activities but belonged to a greater cognitive ecosystem, which the volume’s four sections reflect: “The Visual Imagination,” “Sensory and Affective Imaginings,” “Artifice and the Mnemonic Imagination,” and “Higher Imaginings.” Together they accentuate the imagination’s interdependency and friction with other faculties. Ultimately, the volume’s attention to the embodied imagination gives scholars new perspectives on literary and image production in the writings of Spenser, Shakespeare, Donne, and their contemporaries.

Mark Kaethler is Academic Chair of Arts at Medicine Hat College in Medicine Hat, Canada. They work on research teams with the Map of Early Modern London and Linked Early Modern Drama Online at the University of Victoria, both of which have been funded by SSHRC grants. They are Book Reviews Editor for Early Theatre, and they are the author of Thomas Middleton and the Plural Politics of Jacobean Drama as well as a co-editor of Shakespeare’s Language in Digital Media: Old Words, New Tools. Their work has appeared in Shakespeare, The London Journal, Early Theatre, Literature Compass, and several other journals and edited collections.

Grant Williams is an Associate Professor in the Department of English at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. With William E. Engel, he has co-edited the essay collection The Shakespearean Death Arts (Palgrave, 2022), and, with Engel and Rory Loughnane, co-edited the collection Memory and Mortality in Renaissance England (Cambridge, 2022). With Donald Beecher, he is co-editor of Henry Chettle’s Kind-Heart’s Dream and Piers Plainness: Two Pamphlets from the Elizabethan Book Trade (CRRS, 2022). He has co-authored two critical anthologies with Engel and Loughnane: The Death Arts in Renaissance England (Cambridge, 2022) and The Memory Arts in Renaissance England (Cambridge, 2016).

Sonderbeitrag

Provides an exclusive focus on the relationship between imagination and cognition in early modern literature Explores embodiment’s implications for internal thought and imagination Connects the broken link between image and imagination in early modern literary criticism

Unpublished endorsement

This is a rich and thoughtful volume that, while being grounded in readings of faculty psychology with early modern English literature, also ranges widely across not only genres but also much of the core timeline of the period. In focusing on the pre-Cartesian nexus between the mind and body, the authors’ collective focus returns a valuable—and historically grounded—specificity and richness to our understanding of a mental faculty that at once worried and fascinated the writers of the period.<div> <div>-Todd Butler, Washington State University, USA.</div></div>